Friday, February 21, 2025 8am to 3:45pm
About this Event
2000 H St NW, Washington DC 20052
In 1990, the California Supreme Court decided Moore v. UC Regents, and both health law and property law has wrestled with the decision in the thirty-five years since. The case involved a cancer patient who sued his doctors and their biomedical company for using his cells without his knowledge or consent to create a valuable cell line. The court’s decision to deny the patient a property right over his cells, while awarding more nominal damages based on contractual and fiduciary duty law, has had implications for biomedical research, patients’ rights, and private law theory.
This conference discusses the legacy of Moore, its implications for contemporary health policy and medical innovation, and how property law intersects with bodily autonomy.
Schedule
8 am - Breakfast
8:45 - 10 am: Panel 1: Moore v. UC Regents in the classroom: Contrasting Interpretations and Lessons
Moderator: Dean Dayna Matthew, George Washington University Law School
10:15 - 11:30 am: Panel 2: Property Law and the Body
Moderator: Sonia Suter, George Washington University Law School
11:45 am - 1 pm: Lunchtime Keynote
The Henrietta Lacks Legacy at Johns Hopkins University
1:15 - 2:30 pm: Panel 3: Property Law and Bodily Information
Moderator: Robert Brauneis, George Washington University Law School
2:45 - 3:45 pm: Closing Comment: The Theory of Property and the Future of Biological Markets